What is the "value survived" approach to quantifying the value of a constructive trust or monetary award?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from L. v. H., 2004 BCSC 1221 (CanLII):
In Peter v. Beblow, it was stated that the “value survived” approach rather than the “value received” approach is often the preferable approach for the purposes of quantifying the value of the constructive trust or monetary award once an unjust enrichment is found.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for awarding constructive trust or a constructive trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making a constructive trust or a monetary award in a claim for unjust enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for finding a constructive trust in a claim for constructive trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
In the context of constructive trust, how have the courts in Canada treated constructive trusts? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a monetary award a "simpler remedy" that should not be awarded if there is evidence that a monetary remedy is not meaningful? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the requirements for a constructive trust and a claim for the constructive trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a constructive trust or constructive trust remedy? (British Columbia, Canada)
On a value survived approach, is a party entitled to claim the value of services and other benefits received by the enriched party? (British Columbia, Canada)
When the BCLRC recommended that the distinction between express and constructive trusts be abolished for limitation purposes, does the distinction take into account the remedial constructive trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on value received and value survived? (British Columbia, Canada)
