Is there any admissible evidence which could result in a directed verdict?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Houlder, 2013 ONSC 5685 (CanLII):

On an application for a directed verdict the question is whether there is any admissible evidence which could, if believed, result in a conviction. USA v. Sheppard 1976 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067 at p. 1080.

Other Questions


What is the test for directing a directed verdict? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
If the evidence the Respondent submitted was to add details of conversations and was not intended or capable or capable of raising any adverse impli­cations regarding the credibility of the complainant, is it admissible evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What impact would the inclusion of the evidence in the context of section 24(2) of the Charter under which the evidence is excluded? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a medical report be admissible as evidence at a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
In determining whether an employer has led sufficient evidence to give rise to a practical evidentiary burden, what is the test for this type of evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the principals of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to evidence that contradicts the evidence given by the complainants in their cross-examinations? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a verdict of guilty be safely founded on the evidence of a single witness? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law in which the Court has rejected evidence tendered in affidavit form as other affidavit evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a case generating a "very good but not extraordinary result" for a claimant receive a cost premium for a very good result for the claimant? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.