What is the test for unusual danger in the context of food safety legislation?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Goodman v. Porcupine Plain (Town), 2008 SKQB 416 (CanLII):

Allbright J. in Dehmke v. Westfair Foods Ltd. (supra) commented on unusual danger at para. 27: ¶ 27 The term "unusual danger" throughout the jurisprudence has been held to be fact‑specific depending upon the nature of the premises visited, the class of person to which the invitee belongs, and the reasons for which the invitee entered the premises.

Other Questions


What is the case law on sentencing aboriginal offenders in the context of a dangerous offender hearing? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for knowledge of an individual to have known of an unusual danger? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for permissive waste in the context of fire protection legislation? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a defendant to prove that snow and ice on a parking lot constitutes an unusual danger? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Court of Appeal considered the issue of changed social conditions in the context of social security legislation? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any case law where a defendant was not aware of the unusual danger caused by moisture on the floor into which a plaintiff stepped into? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What constitutes an "unusual danger" to a person who is in possession of an unoccupied building? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a surrender statement in the context of a commercial lease? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for cruelty in the context of human nature? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a Traffic Safety Court Justice of the Peace (JPS) have any authority or authority to reject or reject the evidence presented by the defence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.