51. Given the evidence, Unifor submitted that the decision to deny the grievor the opportunity to work was fundamentally driven by safety concerns and the risk of injury. Relying on the decision in U.F.C.W., Local 175 v. Cargill Canada, 2008 CarswellOnt 8480, 176 L.A.C. (4th) 306 (Jesin) (“Cargill”), the Union argued that two conditions were required to be met if the grievor’s entitlement to exercise his seniority rights was to be denied on those grounds: (1) medical evidence must establish that assigning that work to the grievor would result in a significantly greater risk of injury to him or to others than if the work were assigned to an employee with no disability; and (2) the Employer must demonstrate that it could not accommodate the grievor in a way that would avoid that risk without suffering undue hardship.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.