Under what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of a felony-murder charge?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Haley, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 877, 34 Cal.4th 283, 96 P.3d 170 (Cal. 2004):

[17 Cal.Rptr.3d 905]

Defendant asserts that these instructions were erroneous and confusing because the felony-murder rule requires that a defendant must have the specific intent to commit one of the enumerated felonies (e.g., People v. Hernandez, supra, 47 Cal.3d at p. 346, 253 Cal.Rptr. 199, 763 P.2d 1289), which means that the defendant must harbor specific intent to commit every element of burglary or robbery, not just the specific intent to steal. The trial judge should have stated, defendant asserts, that the prosecutor needed to prove defendant specifically intended to commit every element of the burglary and robbery, as opposed to stating generally that the specific intent requirement for felony murder is "the specific intent as included in the definitions of the crimes."

[17 Cal.Rptr.3d 905]

Not so. We rejected this precise argument in People v. Pollock (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1153, 1175, 13 Cal.Rptr.3d 34, 89 P.3d 353, stating: "Defendant argues that a specific intent to commit the underlying felony means a specific intent to commit the crime as a whole or . . . to commit each element of the underlying felony, and not merely the specific intent, if any, that is required for the commission of the underlying felony. [] Defendant is mistaken, at least as to underlying felonies that are specific intent crimes. For felony murder in the commission of a robbery or of a burglary in which entry is made for the purpose of theft, the only specific intent that the prosecution must prove is the specific intent to steal the victim's property, which includes a specific intent to permanently deprive the victim of the property. [Citation.] A defendant who has this specific intent has the only specific intent required for liability under the felony-murder rule." (See also People v. Visciotti (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1, 56, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 495, 825 P.2d 388 [stating that intent to steal is the only mental state relevant to felony murder in the commission of robbery].)

Other Questions


What is the effect of Section 969a of the California Criminal Code when a jury has found a defendant not guilty of a charge of assault but found him guilty of the same charge? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found not guilty of a charge but found guilty of assault? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of a special circumstance charge under Section 187 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's recent finding that a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of perverting the course of justice in a sexual assault case has been found guilty of a similar charge in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury reverse a finding that a defendant guilty only of manslaughter be found guilty of a lesser charge? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found guilty of a charge under section 1109 of the California Criminal Code of Civil Procedure for domestic violence prior to the charge being brought against him? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant appeal against his conviction for assault on a charge of assault against a defendant who pleaded guilty to the same charge? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a rule in the criminal code allowing a defendant to plead guilty to a lesser charge if they are found guilty of the same offence? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to plead guilty to a charge that was dismissed in exchange for a plea of guilty to another charge? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.