Does Rule 31.06(2) address all persons who might reasonably be expected to have knowledge of the accident?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Cabanas et al v. Sahi et al, 2014 ONSC 2278 (CanLII):
Rule 31.06(2) does not address trial witnesses but all persons who might reasonably be expected to have knowledge of the accident. This is a much broader group of people of whom trial witnesses would constitute a smaller group; see Davies v. Clarington (Municipality), [2010] O.J. No. 4900 (S.C.J.) at para. 23.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the range of damages for loss of salary, pension benefits and bonuses that an employee might reasonably have expected to continue his employment during the reasonable notice period? (Ontario, Canada)
If a deponent has no actual knowledge of the facts, can he seek undertakings or person with knowledge? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable grounds for establishing that reasonable grounds are reasonable grounds? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable expectation that a person with mental health issues will not be harmed by a stranger? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a defendant has raised a reasonable doubt as to the allegation that in driving her vehicle at the material time, she failed to exercise due care and attention or afford reasonable consideration to other persons using the highway? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the consequences of a personal injury claim being awarded personally against a lawyer? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the reasons for the release of reasons for judgement? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a rebuttable presumption of knowledge of a client's knowledge of an order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for proportionality and reasonableness when determining the amount of costs in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
In assessing whether a police officer has reasonable grounds to justify the arrest, what is the test for reasonable grounds? (Ontario, Canada)
