Second, in Tolofson v. Jensen, legislation providing for time limitations on causes of action was in force in both jurisdictions. The relevant difference between the law in each jurisdiction was the specific time within which the actions must be brought. Thus, the notion that a cause of action may be unavailable due to the passage of time clearly accorded with basic public policy in each jurisdiction. It is otherwise here. As discussed, the B.C. legislature has elected to absolutely prohibit claims for loss of consortium, while California permits them; as such, the two laws reflect a clear difference in underlying values espoused by the legislators in each jurisdiction.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.