In the White v. Stonestreet decision of December 8, 2005, Mr. Justice Ehrcke dealt with the issue. At issue in that case were statements made to the plaintiff’s physician and his physiotherapist. All parties in that case agreed that the plaintiff’s statement to the physician and the physiotherapist were admissible to the fact that they were said but in contention was whether or not they were admissible as evidence of their truth. Mr. Justice Ehrcke said, at para. 7: . . . Of course, even if they were admitted for the latter purpose, their weight would still have to be assessed, like that of all the other evidence, at the conclusion of the trial. . . .
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.