While this error was “palpable” in as much as it was obvious, it was not “overriding” as the error was not determinative of the outcome of the case: Salomon v. Matte-Thompson, above at para. 33. This is because there are other material benefits that are enjoyed by individuals in Canada that constitute performance of “hotel services” in this country, which are sufficient to amount to “use” of the WALDORF ASTORIA mark for the purposes of section 45 of the Act.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.