In summary, then, to employ the “value survived” approach outlined by McLachlin J. in Peter v. Beblow, it is necessary for me to determine: 1. the period of the relationship; 2. the value brought into the relationship by each party, which, in this case, is the value of the equity of Ms. M.L.J.S. at the commencement of the relationship; 3. the value of the property at the end of the relationship; 4. the portion of any increase attributable to the efforts of each. While that may result in a monetary award of 50% of the increase in the value of the property during a long relationship, particularly when it is not possible to precisely quantify the respective contributions, there is no presumption that it will do so. That depends on the nature and the extent of the contributions by each. III. FINDINGS OF FACT
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.