What is the "value received" approach in determining the amount of damages awarded by the Court of Appeal?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lakusta v. Jones, 1997 CanLII 14903 (AB QB):
In determining the amount to be reimbursed under a monetary award, the “value received” approach is appropriate: Peter v. Beblow, supra at p. 344.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal have any hesitation in overturning an award of damages by a jury? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Court have any authority to transfer proceedings under R.12 from the Court of Appeal to the Superior Court? (Alberta, Canada)
What damages would have been awarded under a "generous assessment" by the majority of the Court of Appeal for loss of expectation of life? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the range of damages awarded by the Court of Appeal for a cardiac arrest? (Alberta, Canada)
What authority does the Court of Appeal have in common with the Courts of Appeal in England and Wales? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for appeal leave to appeal the decision of a development appeal board? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the range of damages awarded to the wife for the increase in value of the properties owned by the husband before the marriage? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a "strictly strict" and "unnecessarily strict" test for the purpose of determining the value of a deceased's assets? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
