Is expert evidence admissible in relation to the operation of a commercial vehicle?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Uy v Dhillon, 2019 BCSC 1136 (CanLII):
While expert evidence may be admissible in relation to the operation of a commercial vehicle in relation to the application of the rules of the road, it is not necessary: see MacEachern v. Rennie, 2010 BCSC 625 at 549.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for admissibility of expert evidence in motor vehicle cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a co-owner of a vehicle be considered a "principal operator" of the vehicle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a motorist entitled to be questioned by a police officer on a matter unrelated to the operation of his vehicle on a motor vehicle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to lead expert evidence to overcome a no evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is affidavit evidence admissible in a motor vehicle prohibition application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for producing expert evidence in a motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an applicant and respondent at a summary trial rely on expert reports, examinations for discovery, interrogatories, use of admissions, and expert reports? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admissibility of expert reports containing hearsay evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BCSC find that evidence of J.B. and her evidence be inconsistent in relation to particular events? (British Columbia, Canada)
