20. The union submitted that the collective agreement was not ambiguous and therefore the evidence of past practice is not helpful. In support of this proposition counsel for the union noted that in one case the learned arbitrator found that the term “total pay” was not ambiguous (Re: Pure Metal Galvanizing v. U.S.W.A., , 11 L.A.C. (4th) 71 (McLaren)).
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.