What is the test for inferring causation in a motor vehicle accident?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Jackson v. Kelowna General Hospital, 2007 BCCA 129 (CanLII):

The issue on appeal is whether the trial judge erred in failing to infer causation, in accordance with Snell v. Farrell, 1990 CanLII 70 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311. The appellant argues that the trial judge erred in law in her application of the test set out in Snell, as a result of factual errors arising from a misapprehension of the evidence.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is an accident or an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent motor vehicle collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can inferences of causation be drawn in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident involving a stolen vehicle, can the driver of the stolen vehicle be held liable for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing causation between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a motor vehicle accident be employment-connected where the accident occurred on a driveway or roadway extending between the employer's premises and the public roadway? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident reconstruction case, can the accident reconstruction experts provide any assistance? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the law on liability for an injured person who is injured in an accident while trying to rescue someone from a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing causation in a motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
How can a plaintiff prove causation in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.