The appellant submits that the trial judge did not adequately consider the fact that during the delay the appellant had a cell phone available to him or alternatively, that the police station was close by where a telephone would be available. Counsel for the appellant submits that the availability of a cell phone and the proximity of the police station were relevant considerations that the trial judge should have taken into account in determining if there was a realistic opportunity to consult counsel. In his submission counsel referred to R v. George.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.