What is the burden of proof for the prosecution in a dangerous driving case involving an accused who testifies on his own behalf?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v Bradley, 2016 ONSC 2003 (CanLII):

After extensively reviewing the evidence heard at trial, the trial judge noted the burden of proof upon the prosecution, “the principles in Regina v. W.D.” with the appellant having testified, and the relevant jurisprudence respecting dangerous operation of a motor vehicle. The reasons also identified the correct legal approach to use of a prior criminal record respecting an accused who testifies on his own behalf.

Other Questions


What is the risk of dangerous driving when an intoxicated individual uses a mobility scooter for non-driving purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of dangerous driving when he strikes a cyclist he was attempting to pass while driving at an excessive speed? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between the burden of proof and the evidential burden? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the sentence for an impaired driver who pleaded guilty to impaired driving and dangerous driving causing bodily harm? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proof in a case involving the imputing of income? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proof and what is the test to prove? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court award costs in a case involving an unjustified or flagrant disregard for the rights of the accused? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for negligence in the context of dangerous driving? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proof against a party who is not a party to the birth of the child? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proof against a party who claims business expenses to reduce their income for child support purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.