What is the test for setting a trial date for adding a party to the trial?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Dungate v. Dungate, 2015 BCSC 2225 (CanLII):
In this case, the trial is set for December 2015, and it is presently the end of October. In determining what is just and convenient, a court must consider whether adding a proposed party would effectively hijack the proceedings, by increasing the number of parties, issues and overall scope of the litigation with resulting costs and delay. That is discussed in Gladue v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2010 BCSC 788 at para. 13.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for adding a party to an application to add a party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party recover in restitution where another party has been unjustly enriched at that party's expense? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adding parties to a personal injury trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a child support agreement entered into between the parties binding the parties to child support? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making an adjournment application at the opening of a trial on the grounds that a party cannot be present? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have real property been valued at the date of trial rather than at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
