Does the tort of deceit require a privity of contract or a contractual foundation?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Paragon Properties (Finance) Ltd. v. Del Swan Trucking Inc., 1998 ABQB 803 (CanLII):

Despite the protestations of the Defendant, it has long been established that the tort of deceit does not require a privity of contract or, indeed, a contractual foundation at all (Pasley v. Freeman (1789), 100 E.R. 450).

Other Questions


In what circumstances will a party be bound by the elements of a contract where the contract is not enforceable when the contract was signed? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a contract enforceable for breach of contract when the contract is not enforceable? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for interpretation of a clause in a contract where a plaintiff is required to provide a written assurance of his own rights? (Alberta, Canada)
Does an agent have to be personally liable on a contract where the principal of the contract is not personally liable? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a party who dictates different terms for a contract already formed be considered to be refusing to perform the contract as written? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an assignee or assignee of a vendor under a conditional sales contract, and if so, what are the consequences if the vendor decides to cancel the contract? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a contract where a party contracts to cut for a quantity of wood and haul and deliver the wood at a time and to a place mentioned? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the meaning of a contract law case in contract law? (Alberta, Canada)
How has contract law been interpreted in the context of tenders in construction contracts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "contract" in the context of an enforceable contract? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.