It is not disputed that the appropriate test for the granting of a stay pending appeal is a three-stage test, based on RJR-MacDonald v. Canada (Attorney General), 1994 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311. At the first stage, the judge must consider whether the appeal has any merit. If it does, the court will consider whether the appellant might suffer irreparable harm if a stay was refused. Finally, the court must apply a balance of convenience test, determining whether the inconvenience suffered by the appellant in the absence of a stay would exceed the inconvenience to the respondent if a stay were granted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.