What are the reasons for the committal order against a business product?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from United States v. Wilson, 2011 BCCA 514 (CanLII):
In the course of those reasons, the judge stated that the appellant’s business product, a form of insurance or protection against the effect of improper charges being made on an individual’s credit card was, in fact, “unnecessary, pointless and useless” (United States v. Wilson, (17 December 2009), Vancouver 24101 (S.C.) at para. 10). This conclusion is the basis of the appellant’s third ground of appeal against the committal order. The appellant asserts that there is no evidence to support this conclusion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a husband's contribution to a business considered a family asset in determining if the business asset is a business asset? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a desk order pronounced on February 28, 2011 a dismissal of a request for a custody order and a support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
If an order is not clear or ambiguous, is the reason for judgment an indicator of the objective meaning of the order? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order security for future good behaviour instead of committal to jail, or a fine or both? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Master order production of documents under Rule 26(11)? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a decision maker review an entered order or related reasons? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
