The third consideration is the legal principles applicable to the claim itself. The minority decision of Mr. Justice Dickson in Rathwell v. Rathwell, 1978 CanLII 3 (SCC), [1978] 2 S.C.R. 436 is the lighthouse, describing resulting trusts and constructive trusts. At pp. 451-452 Mr. Justice Dickson dealt with resulting trusts in these words: Resulting trusts are as firmly grounded in the settlor's intent as are express trusts, but with this difference - that the intent is inferred, or is presumed as a matter of law from the circumstances of the case. ... The presumption of a resulting trust is sometimes explained as the fact of contribution evidencing an agreement ... The courts are looking for a common intention manifested by acts or words that property is acquired as a trustee.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.