Can a judge recuse themselves and not hear a matter?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from A.N.B. v. Hancock, 2013 ABQB 97 (CanLII):

The test for when a judge should recuse themselves and not hear a matter is provided in Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2003 SCC 45 (CanLII) at para. 60, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, and asks whether an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having thought through the matter, would conclude that it is more likely than not that a judge, whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide it fairly.

Other Questions


Can a judge override a trial judge's decision that a shared parenting arrangement is working well? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the impact of unnecessary recusal by a trial judge? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between a chambers judge and a trial judge? (Alberta, Canada)
If a judge makes an order requiring notice to be given, does the judge have the authority to vary or revoke the order? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a declaration inadmissible as a matter of law because it contains matter favoring the interest of the deceased as well as against it? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a declaration inadmissible as a matter of law because it contains matter favouring the interest of the deceased as well as against it? (Alberta, Canada)
Does s. 717(4) of the English Draft Code (a) prohibit a judge from making a sentence for a second offence that is already been imposed by another judge in the case in which he is sentencing? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a trial judge extrapolate back that because a cow became sick, it must have been exposed to hydrocarbons? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a trial judge be barred from proceeding on the principle that a reasonable apprehension of bias exists? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review in an appeal of a civil matter? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.