What is the test for leave on substantive issues?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Basque v. Stranges, 2010 ONSC 5605 (CanLII):
Thus, “the test for leave on substantive issues is less rigorous than arises with respect to routine interlocutory matters”: see Edwards v. Adduono, [2002] O.J. No. 394 (S.C.J.), at para. 31. prejudice and costs
“At the same time, full consideration shall be given to any prejudice to the party opposing the motion that cannot be compensated for by costs”: see Tanner v. Clark, ibid. principles to be applied will vary
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for using the term issue "issue" in the context of the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal finding on the "live issue" in the context of the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for appeal judges to grant leave to allow a party to argue an entirely new issue on appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for granting leave to issue a third party claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is issue estoppel applicable in a civil proceeding after adjudication of issues in an administrative hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
In the context of the issue of handguns in the city of Toronto, what is the current state of the law around the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for competent and informed advice in the context of the issue of Issue 1(a) of the Irish Times? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court grant leave and certification under the CPA and also grant leave to proceed under Part XXIII of the Securities Act? (Ontario, Canada)
Can punitive damages be certified as a common issue for the first common issues trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law regarding mobility issues and custody and mobility issues? (Ontario, Canada)
