What is the test for explanation by a doctor?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Allison v. Traff, 2003 ABQB 17 (CanLII):

Of course in any case the test for explanation by the doctor is succinctly stated in Ciarlariello v. Keller, 1993 CanLII 138 (SCC), 100 D.L.R. (4th) 609 (S.C.C.), p. 617: In deciding whether a risk is material and, therefore, one which should be explained to the patient, an objective approach should be taken. The crucial question in determining the issue is whether a reasonable person in the patient’s position would want to know of the risk. That presupposes that the patient is not already aware of the possible material risks of a surgical procedure. If she is already aware of the possible material risks and consents to the procedure she accepts the possible risks.

Other Questions


What are the duties of a doctor in the fiduciary relationship with a patient? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a medical doctor have a duty to inform a patient of the possible risks of treatment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by a doctor to disclose to a patient of a proposed surgery or treatment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of care expected by a doctor in a medical malpractice case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a doctor to be qualified as a public professional? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the liability of a doctor who fails to follow a commonly accepted standard of practice? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the duty of confidentiality owed by a doctor to a patient to the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for disclosing personal information to a doctor? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a doctor have a duty to disclose information to a patient? (Alberta, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, is a doctor permitted to refer to a patient’s medical chart containing information that is not relevant to the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.