What is the test for apportioning costs between the usual tariff and the fast track rules?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Bishop v. Eng, 2017 BCSC 270 (CanLII):
The test for apportionment remains the same whether costs are awarded pursuant to the usual tariff or the fast track rules: Mothe v. Silva, 2015 BCSC 1053.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts in BC used Rule 57(15) of the Rules of Civil Procedure to apportion costs between parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of Rule 37B of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on Rule 37 B of the Rules of Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff claim lump sum costs under Rule 66(29) of the Rules of Civil Procedure under Rule 37? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with motions under Rule 34 and Rule 19(24)(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the Rais rely on Rule 37 or Rule 37A to claim costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current test for apportioning costs under Rule 57(15)? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the husband be ordered to pay costs to the wife for his failure to comply with the rules of court and order the wife to pay solicitor and client costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the onus on a party who seeks to displace the usual rule that costs follow in the event? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the word "wilful delay or default" in Rule 52(5) of Rule 52 of the Rules of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
