Skeena submits that the test for an asset preservation order is different than that for a Mareva injunction. An applicant for a preservation order must show: (1) a fair or a serious question to be tried, on the evidence and not just on the pleadings, as to the plaintiff's entitlement to a proprietary interest in property; (2) a fair or serious question to be tried, on the evidence and not just on the pleadings, that the property is threatened with disposition or transfer outside the jurisdiction; and (3) the balance of convenience favours the granting of the injunction: Osooli‑Talesh v. Emami, 2003 BCSC 1924.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.