The alternative interpretation, espoused by the respondent, is that while the tax is on the lease price, the property to which it relates is the vessel itself. The respondent argues that just as a tax on a “purchase price” under s. 2(1) is “in respect of the thing purchased (Danes v. R. in Right of B.C.), so a tax on a “lease price” under s. 2.1(1) is “in respect of the thing leased, that is, the vessel.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.