Does the doctrine of res judicata extend to rulings as to the admissibility of confessions?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Kleysen v. Canada (Attorney General), 2001 MBQB 205 (CanLII):
Duhamel v. The Queen (1984), 1984 CanLII 126 (SCC), 15 C.C.C. (3d) 491 (S.C.C.), is authority for the proposition that the doctrine of res judicata ought not to be extended to rulings as to the admissibility of confessions.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law on the admissibility of expert evidence in the context of false confessions? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is the indoor management rule an agency rule? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the confession rule? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the nature of an accused's confession and what is the substance of that confession? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the admissibility of a confession in a criminal case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the principle of the rule on a contract where a party is bound by their own word? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does the doctrine of mootness apply to an action or proceeding? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have the courts considered the admissibility of photographs? (Manitoba, Canada)
How has the doctrine of mootness been interpreted in the context of a personal injury action? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does the doctrine supporting finality of court decisions apply equally to decisions made by administrative officers or tribunals? (Manitoba, Canada)
