What are some of the most recent decisions in medical malpractice cases?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Firman v Asadi, 2018 BCSC 2437 (CanLII):

Another leading authority is the decision of Madam Justice MacKenzie in Cunningham v. Slubowski, 2003 BCSC 1854 [Cunningham]. In that case, MacKenzie J. was dealing with an application by the plaintiff to admit clinical records of a family doctor. The application was brought pre-trial. The family doctor in question had produced an expert report that was ruled admissible in evidence and counsel for the defendants was expecting to cross‑examine that doctor at the trial.

Other Questions


Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal basis for medical justification in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between operational and policy decisions in the context of a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the validity of evidence in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the disposition of a medical malpractice case at a medical review board? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on non-pecuniary damages in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have medical and/or legal opinions been interpreted in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by the Canadian Medical Association in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care of the medical staff in the context of medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts treated medical malpractice cases in the context of malpractice? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.