What is the reasonableness standard for a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mackenzie v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2017 BCSC 2392 (CanLII):

The recent decision of Kenyon v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCCA 485 provides a comprehensive overview of the reasonableness standard while also clarifying what is meant by the term “manifestly flawed” which is seen in some of the case law that deals with the decisions of the Superintendent or his or her delegate:

Other Questions


What is the reasonableness standard for a judicial review of a decision by a provincial superintendent of motor vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness of a decision by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the reasonableness standard apply to decisions of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness for a decision by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness of a judicial review of a decision made by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a superintendent of motor vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles in a bar case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for reasonableness in the context of a superintendent of motor vehicles review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles decision in a bar case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied to a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)