In considering s. 27 of the CCRA, in Vereschagin v. Kent (9 May 2002), Vancouver 20529 (B.C.S.C.), Henderson J. commented at para. 5: The “summary” must be sufficiently detailed to inform the offender of the substance of the allegation, so as to permit him to make a meaningful reply. It is not expected that every bit of information considered in the taking of the decision will be expressed in the summary, but all of the most significant aspects of the information should be described in some fashion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.