What is the Statue of Frauds?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Prusky v. Warsh et al., 2010 ONSC 5912 (CanLII):

In the absence of an oral agreement, the Statue of Frauds operates. This case is very different from what Quigley J. was dealing with in Mariani v. 778963 Ontario Ltd. 37 R.P.R. (4th) 79. There, the three men involved had purchased one piece of land together and each retained a one-third interest in the property. It made sense that a mechanism had to have been crafted to deal with the possibility of one wanting to sell his interest in the joint property – that was the context in which that case was decided.

Other Questions


Does the pleading of equitable fraud constitute unconscionable or equitable fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the evidence of fraud and dissipation of assets be inferred together? (Ontario, Canada)
How strong a case of fraud is necessary to defeat a claim for legal professional privilege? (Ontario, Canada)
What constitutes “other fraudulent means” in the context of corporate fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing fraud in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for knowing assistance in mortgage fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden of proving badges of fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for proving a claim of fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for unknowing involvement in a real estate fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for proving dishonesty of fraud in a real estate transaction? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.