What is the standard of review applicable to a motion to appeal against a motion for summary judgment?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from Finn v. St. John's (City of), 2002 NLCA 76 (CanLII):

The standards of review applicable are well established. As to pure questions of law, the standard of review is correctness. For findings of fact, it is palpable and overriding error. As to inferences of fact, an appellate court will intervene only if the trial judge has made a palpable and overriding error in coming to a factual conclusion based on accepted facts. See: Housen v. Nickolaisen (2002), 211 D.L.R. (4th) 577, 2002 SCC 33 (CanLII). The Issues

Other Questions


What is the standard of review in the context of a motion by the Court of Appeal? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What are the considerations used in settling an application for leave to appeal rule 38 of the Court of Appeal? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the standard of review in a second level appeal? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to awards of damages in past loss of income cases? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the application of a legal test to the facts as found? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What are the grounds of appeal for reinstatement in a Notice of Appeal? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the standard of appeal and what is the test for determining that a third respondent’s solicitor acted in a conflict of interest? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision by a tribunal? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the standard of review in the context of a child protection matter? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the standard for appellate review regarding findings of fact? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.