What is the standard of review for patent unreasonableness?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hydro Ottawa Limited v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (Local 636), 2007 ONCA 292 (CanLII):

Counsel agree that the standard of review is patent unreasonableness: Lakeport Beverages v. Teamsters Local Union 938, supra, at paras. 20-34. While that term has been the subject of numerous attempts at description in the authorities, a decision is generally considered to be patently unreasonable only if it is "clearly irrational" or "evidently not in accordance with reason" [See Note 2 below] or if it produces "a result [that] must almost border on the absurd". [See Note 3 below] 2. The Arbitrator's decision

Other Questions


What is the patent unreasonableness standard for a patently unreasonable interpretation? (Ontario, Canada)
When the two standards of reasonableness and patent unreasonableness have been collapsed into a single standard, what is the current state of the law on deference? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for an appeal from a judgment refusing judicial review? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a bail review? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a Minister's refusal to disclose records on a standard of correctness? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied to a review of an assessment officer’s decision? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review in judicial review? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an Assessment Officer to be reviewed by the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the purposes of determining whether a decision should be reviewed in a civil proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a judicial review of an administrative decision? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.