What is the standard of review for questions of mixed fact and law?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Lin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 1020 (CanLII):

The standard of review with respect to questions of mixed fact and law are assessed on the standard of reasonableness as set out in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, para 47: In judicial review, reasonableness is concerned mostly with the existence of justification, transparency and intelligibility within the decision-making process. But it is also concerned with whether the decision falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law. Analysis

Other Questions


Does the standard of review apply to questions of mixed fact and law? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for questions of law and mixed fact and law? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for questions of mixed fact and law? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for mixed questions of law and fact in a tax case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for mixed questions of fact and law? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to a question of mixed fact and law? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for mixed questions of law and fact? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for mixed questions of natural justice and law? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for questions of mixed fact and law? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for questions of fact or mixed fact and law? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.