What is the standard of review for a Master's Order?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Gillespie v. Pompeo, 2013 BCSC 843 (CanLII):
The standard of review is whether the Master’s order can be said to be “clearly wrong”, unless the order is vital to a final issue in the case or is a decision on a point of law, in which case the review is by way of a rehearing, unfettered by any deference to the order under appeal: Stoneman v. Desjardins, 2004 BCSC 57 at para. 7.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a master’s order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court in reviewing child support orders? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a master's interlocutory order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeal from a master’s order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a roadside driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a desk order pronounced on February 28, 2011 a dismissal of a request for a custody order and a support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review analysis on a judicial review application? (British Columbia, Canada)
