What is the standard of palpable and overriding error on a contract?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Financial Management Inc. v. Planidin, 2006 ABCA 44 (CanLII):

These are questions of mixed fact and law, which are reviewable on the standard of palpable and overriding error unless a purely legal question can be extricated, in which case the standard is that of correctness: Housen v. Nikolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, 2002 SCC 33 (CanLII) at paras. 27 and 36. Was the appellant personally liable on the contract?

Other Questions


What is the standard of review for the purpose of determining whether a trial judge made a palpable and overriding error? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a party be bound by the elements of a contract where the contract is not enforceable when the contract was signed? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether a question of mixed fact and law is correct or palpable and overriding error? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a finding of fact be reviewed for palpable and overriding error? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a contract enforceable for breach of contract when the contract is not enforceable? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a party who dictates different terms for a contract already formed be considered to be refusing to perform the contract as written? (Alberta, Canada)
Can facts establish a breach of contract and arise from carelessness in the performance of the contract? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an assignee or assignee of a vendor under a conditional sales contract, and if so, what are the consequences if the vendor decides to cancel the contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "contract" in the context of an enforceable contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How has contract law been interpreted in the context of tenders in construction contracts? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.