What standard of care is that of a reasonably competent lawyer in the conduct of litigation?

Prince Edward Island, Canada


The following excerpt is from Li v Macnutt & Dumont and Walters, 2019 PECA 30 (CanLII):

The trial judge was correct to state that in the conduct of litigation the standard of care is that of a reasonably competent lawyer and that a judgment call in the course of litigation that could reasonably have been made by a reasonably competent lawyer in similar circumstances will not amount to negligence even if it is proven later that a different position would have produced a better result (at para.8, and see Meister v. Coyle, 2010 NSSC 125).

Other Questions


What are the reasons of a trial judge's failure to state that they have a reasonable doubt? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the standard of care required by the courts to determine negligent conduct? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What compelling reasons exist which lead the court to deviate from the status quo? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the appellate standard of review in a mixed fact matter? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the standard for assessing a person’s risk of injury in a motor vehicle accident? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the standard of proof for a finding of negligent investigation by a public police force? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the role of medical experts in assessing standard of care? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the standard of correctness of a tribunal arbitrator's interpretation of common law? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
Does a recusal made for the expressed reason of avoiding perception of bias affect subsequent return to involvement in the performance of the statutory function? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.