First, is the known sound level of the unit considered to be a nuisance?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ramanand v. De Paula, 2012 MBQB 335 (CanLII):
Third, there is precedent that the known sound level of the unit based on the evidence on this motion has been found to be a nuisance in another case, namely, Suzuki v. Munroe, 2009 BCSC 1403, 87 R.P.R. (4th) 68 (B.C.S.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a payor's pension is equalized with respect to property equalization, does the court need to consider the equalization also consider the value of the payor’s pension? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have the courts considered the admissibility of photographs? (Manitoba, Canada)
In a motion for directed verdict, in what circumstances will the trial judge not have considered the evidence of Timothy? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court find a golf driving range liable in nuisance? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can an applicant argue that an arbitrator or tribunal has not explicitly considered every argument or issue raised by the parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law where an umpire considered information of one party without the knowledge of the other party? (Manitoba, Canada)
When will an arbitrator's decision be considered unreasonable? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles to apply in the context of a motion by a plaintiff to have his case considered on the merits of the motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for a court to consider in determining whether or not a child has been removed from the custody of the access parent? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have courts considered whether the discharge of a missile by the enemy was a cause of injury? (Manitoba, Canada)
