The Society explains the two remedies in the context of there being two aspects to a constitutional challenge to legislation. As set out in Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 1997 CanLII 327 (SCC), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624 at para. 20, the panel may find the legislation unconstitutional on its face because it violates a Charter right and is not saved by s. 1 of the Charter. This would be a circumstance where disregarding the offending provisions would be an appropriate remedy. Alternatively, the panel may find that the Charter is infringed, not by the legislation, but by the delegated decision-maker in applying it. It is in the second case that s. 24 (1) may provide a remedy.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.