The sincerity of a complainant’s religious belief is a question of fact based on their credibility and factors such as whether their alleged belief is consistent with their religious practices at the material times: Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 2004 SCC 47 [Amselem] at para. 53. The law is well established that a claim of religious discrimination only requires a complainant to show their belief is sincere, not that it is valid according to others or that it is required or in conformity with the position of religious officials: Amselem at paras. 43-47. In addition, while evidence of a complainant’s past religious practices might be relevant, it is not determinative because a person’s religious beliefs may change or evolve over time. The focus of the analysis must always be on the complainant’s belief at the time of the alleged discrimination: Amselem at para. 53.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.