This principle of the shifting onus is confirmed in Johnson v. Halifax Regional Police Service, [2003] N.S.H.R.B.I.D. No. 2: When a prima facie case is made out, the burden then shifts to the respondent to demonstrate, on a balance of probabilities, that there was a rational and credible justification for his/her conduct. At that point, the burden of proof shifts back to the applicant to show that the justifications are “mere pretexts or veils” for discriminatory conduct.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.