Is it just and convenient to add the Applicants?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from United States of America (Consumer Protection Bureau) v Chang, 2017 BCSC 2318 (CanLII):
The second part of the two pronged test is whether it is just and convenient to add the Applicants. The considerations include whether there will be resulting costs and delay due to the increase in the number of the parties, issues and the overall scope of the litigation: see Gladue v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2010 BCSC 788 at para. 13.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can an application be brought to dismiss an application under s. 27(1)(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles applicable on an application to re-open a trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the balance of convenience on an interlocutory application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an alternative argument that the application of a law of general application to a particular group of Indians in a particular activity is legislation in their Indian-ness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the obligation of a firearms officer to contact the applicant before making a decision on a licence application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where an unsuccessful applicant for Rule 18A application for a summary judgment or cost of costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have a duty to hear an application where the adjudicator of the application has been found in error? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application to dismiss on an interlocutory application be dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
On an interim support application, can the court get bogged down with the merits of the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test applicable to a custody application to vary custody? (British Columbia, Canada)
