Dealing with the second point, there is not a sufficient evidentiary basis to conclude that privilege has been waived by the plaintiff. In order for there to be waiver of privilege, it must be shown that the possessor of the privilege knows of the privilege, had the intention to waive it, and that the person who is purported to have waived it had authority to waive it. I rely here on Zapf v. Muckalt, 1995 CanLII 902 (B.C.S.C. in chambers). These elements of waiver are not established on the evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.