On appeal, what are the grounds of appeal against the finding that a trial judge did not determine which story is true?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Stueck, 1990 CanLII 7749 (SK CA):
The second ground took issue with the trial judge having said, early in his reasons, that he had to determine "which story is true". Had he gone on to determine the matter on that basis, ground for complaint might have arisen, but he did not do so. Read as a whole, his reasons for judgment disclose that he arrived at his conclusion on the footing each of the elements of the offence had to be established beyond a reasonable doubt. The main issue of fact was whether the touching was advertent or inadvertent. The trial judge simply did not believe the accused's testimony that the contact had been accidental, and went on to find that it had been deliberate. Obviously the accused's evidence had not raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of the trial judge on this score. In addition, the trial judge addressed the other elements of the offence and found that they had been made out, saying: "Applying the test specified in Regina v. Chase (1987), 1987 CanLII 23 (SCC), 59 C.R.(3d) 193, I am satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of sexual assault as charged". Having regard for the whole of his reasons, we have not been persuaded that the trial judge erred as suggested in this ground of appeal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the grounds of appeal against the finding that a learned trial judge erred in fact and law in ruling that the force used was substantial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appeal against a finding that a decision made by the Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against the decision not to grant an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for intervenation by the Court of Appeal in findings of fact by a trial judge? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the findings of credibility of the learned trial judge in an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of the trial judge in the context of sexual assault cases? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court interfere with the chambers judge or trial judge on an interim maintenance order? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for dismissing an appeal under s. 613(1) (b)(iii) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the error of a judge at the Court of Appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the trial judge allow the parents of a plaintiff to participate in the trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the consequences of a trial judge’s failure to spell out every consideration leading to a finding of credibility? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of a learned trial judge's finding that two drivers were not at fault in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
