I note that in Ridler v. Gunther, [1991] B.C.J. No. 678 (S.C.), when considering functionality in relation to a two door hatchback, the trial judge found the passengers were susceptible to leg and head injuries even when wearing the seat belts, given the vehicle’s small size. Although there was evidence the seat belt was operable and its lock was functioning, he concluded that without evidence of the seat belt’s extension propensity, meaning the speed of retraction, he was not satisfied the seat belt was operable.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.