What is the scope of appellate review of a finding that a judge err in proceeding to determine the substantive issue by way of summary trial?

Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)

Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)

What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)

When a single issue is proposed for summary trial by way of summary trial, does the court have any consideration in deciding the issue as a whole? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the standard of review for the issues raised on an appeal against the findings of the trial judge? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the standard of appellate review of a trial judge's findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)

In determining whether to grant a Rule 18A trial on part of a trust application, what is the risk that the findings of the application may be carried over to the subsequent determination of other issues? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court reviewing a decision of a trial judge concerning matters of custody and access? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)

Can a chambers judge proceed under Rule 18A of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a summary trial where there is a conflict in the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)