What is the scope of a trial judge's discretion to vary an order following a Reasons for Judgment?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Idle-O Apartments Inc. v. Charlyn Investments Ltd., 2010 BCSC 132 (CanLII):

The scope of a trial judge’s discretion to vary an order following Reasons for Judgment rests on whether a formal order has been entered and to the extent that it remains unentered, there exists an unfettered discretion on the part of a trial judge to re-open the matter: Harrison v. Harrison, 2007 BCCA 120, 237 B.C.A.C. 187.

Other Questions


In what circumstances have the parties considered that the trial judge’s reasons of 27 September 2002 constitute a judgment for which an order can properly be drawn and entered? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a trial judge order a spousal order under s. 15.2(4) of the Divorce Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the statute requiring a judge to hear an application for a stay of an order made by the judge who made the order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a final order being made by a judge after a trial judgment has been entered? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge's discretion to re-open an issue before formal judgment has been entered? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have jurisdiction to enter an entered order on an order for sale of a property made at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have to say the following in order to give an oral judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making a cost order within the scope of the trial judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.