The same conclusion was reached in Barry v. Barry, [1997] O.J. No. 2894. In that case the court held that in the absence of evidence supporting an inference to the contrary, a settlement offer contained in the form of a letter which complies with the essential requirements of rule 49.02 should be treated as an offer to settle under the rules, not as a common law offer.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.