The criteria for an interlocutory order for sale of property are whether it is expedient and necessary. Those words were described in… [Bodo v. Bodo …] as encompassing, in family law proceedings, a number of factors: the needs of the children; the availability of alternative accommodation; the emotional condition of the spouses; external economic factors; wasting of the asset; and the capacity of both parties to maintain the asset. In Reilly v. Reilly … the court adopted the word ‘advantageous’ in place of ‘expedient’, at para. 35: At the risk of over simplification my own view is that what the rule requires, where necessity is not in issue, is that the proposed sale be advantageous to both parties.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.